Site changes

Hi,

I've been tweaking the forum code a bit, so you may notice some weirdness with the forum tags.

Please post here if you find anything too weird...!

Yeah. My sig is displaying the URL, instead of the actual image.

test


[img www.melog.ch/dropper/images/galleries/v80_1_t.jpg]

test

Seems like images are not displayed automaticly, and they require the http:// part when used with the IMG forum tag.

Fixed!


Plain www.blah links are no longer recognized: you must always specify http:// or https://

Ok, this shouldn't be a problem.
Does Mailto work? [a mailto:joe@...]
Edit: obviously not. I never use it, but some people had it in the sig.

Hi,

No [a] required for mailto...

For some reason FileFront links won't work in the link tags. I think its because they have different symbols than regular links. SEE HERE.

MS: if you are coding the forum anyway: ppl have requested an "Indie forum"-category, and some others *cough* a "music & soundeffects forum"-category.. ..multiple times.. :P It's not that very hard to add, no? plz make us all happy :P

Will this fix the weird \ and mailto: that have been adde dautomatically to external DLL functions referenced in code samples?

 function blah(something:int) = "blah@4"

That's right, and he's talking about the code and codebox forum codes.

Don't just twiddle with forum codes... How about a useful "Contact Us" page, which after you use it, you do actually recieve a reply?

That'll be handy ;)

Dabz

I don't understand. I thought he was talking about BlitzMax and DLL's and stuff...
_______________________________________

What would be nice is an add-on to the QUOTE tag.
EG:

[quote=nameofpersontoquote]quotetext[/quote]

So it would come out as this (I'm using a different forum skin):

Yep, gotta admit you should do that.

test

And I'm with Dabz YAY

I recieve replies when I contact them. Good ol' simonh always writes me back. :)

No, I meant on the forum -- for a while, it has been corrupting a bunch of the code snippet in the [code] and [codebox] tages by adding extra backslashes and 'mailto' references when you use the @ in the sourcecode... which means that if you cut/pasted source code containing the @ sign in a function alias or something it wouldn't work and you manually had to fix all occurances first.

But looking at the sample above, it seems that might be fixed now.