Why do people post answers when they don't actually know what they're talking about?
You can charge money for software that includes GPLed stuff. You can even GPL your own stuff and have a commercial license for it too.
The LGPL was created mainly for libraries so that you can dynamically link them without potentially creating a derivative work. As long as you bundle object files or dynamically link, you won't have to release any of your own code.
GPL applies to the distribution of code, and the freedom to copy or modify it. It's not about preventing people from profiting from it.
The GPL makes no sense for licensing images. If you got the images from a GPLed app or game, there's no reason for you to assume that you are free to redistribute those images or create derivatives of them, as they may be under a different license. Under the terms of the GPL, you'd just have to make the images available to be edited or replaced, and any derivatives you made from them would have to be available.