can anybady test this sample performance (windows)

I'm creating an animation module, and I need to test a simple sample. please, if you want to lend a hand, you can download this little sample application here http://www.blide.org/lumt1.rar

This rar contains 3 exes. I need to see performance (FPS) on the 3 files.

mine 10: 1600
100: 365
1000: 47

10 = 1200
100 = 760
1000 = 105

This was all on my Vista set-up in my sig.

Hello.

10=1840
100=670
1000=85

Windows XP
Intel xtreme two core 3'3 GHz. 2Gb RAM
NVidia GeForce 6800 GPU

Bye,
Paposo

2,780 FPS at 10
930-960 FPS at 100, after an initial period of fluctuating from 500-900.
146 FPS at 1,000

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
2 gigs of RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 7900GS

SpaceAce

10 = 2700 +/- 50
100 = 660 +/- 20
1000 = 80 +/- 1

Interesting variation. While I beat all bar SpaceAce at 10, all bar Manel beat me at 1000...

10 = 2375 - 2443
100 = 596 - 606
1000= 70 - 79

Athlon64 3500+ GeForce 6600GT, Dx9c

10 = 1050 +/- 100
100 = 300 +/- 10
1000 = 39 +/- 1

WinXP SP2, 512MB DDR, Geforce4TI 4200 128MB (8x), DX 9c (but i assume u're using OpenGL?!)
NVidia Settings: Optimised for Quality, AA & AF controled by App

10 = 3400-3700
100 = 870-910
100 = 113

10=1500
100=370
1000=60

10 = 3400
100 = 1000
1000 = 135

Windows XP
AMD 3400+
1GB RAM
GForce 6800GS

10 = 173
100 = 34
1000 = 4

Sempron 3100 1.800
SIS M760GX

10 : 2850 - 3180
100 : 660-665
1000 : 78-84

Many thanks, this was a stress test for the module I'm working on now. I'm gladd to see most users are over 60 fps in all versions (except H&K, I wonder why...?)

@insomnia: No it is using DX7. I think using DX9 would be faster, but I'm not sure how stable is the third party DX9 engine.

Thanks a lot to everyone. I'll post more info about this module as soon as it begins to see the light.

880
225
30

Pentium 3GHz with a cheap Radeon 9600 graphics card. I am at work, this is my work PC. My home PC is much better... :)