Best HDTV for Widescreen Blitz Development

Miscellaneous Forums/General Discussion/Best HDTV for Widescreen Blitz Development

Ya guys, I was thinking of designing screen savers and games with the average HDTV/Widescreen LCD monitor in mind, as well as multichannel speaker systems. Now, I know that having a home theater investment is not just meant for HD reception and enjoyment, but as an entertainment software developer, it should be a way to develop games and screen savers for the future, since most PC manufacturers are leaning towards widescreen and Dolby/DTS/THX for the upcoming Vista, OSX Leopard era.

So, to prepare for this, I would like some suggestions of what type of home theater setup would be best for Blitz development. I was thinking of a 32" LCD HDTV, since those are getting into the < $1,000 USD range, yet still around $1,500 USD, which is still more reasonable than they used to be. Also, a good home theater would be around $150 - $400 USD. Now, as far as keeping my development home theater within a $2K budget with all the equipment, what would you recommend off hand (HDTV and 5.1 Dolby system)?

I just purchased this Samsung. ($1450 at Circuit City)

It's 32", and got excellent user reviews on CNET. It has a vga connector so you can hook it to the PC for cheap with a ten foot female/female vga cable. (A PC LCD connector to HDMI tv input cable will run you about $80)

The res is 1358x768. This is less than the full HD res, but as I found almost EVERY set out there right now does not support full HD. They're only JUST starting to come out with "full hd" sets that can do 1920x1080. And those ones are beyond your price range and only available in 40" or higher models from what I saw.

I had purchased a 40" Sharp but found it to be too large, especially when viewing most low res regular TV, and lacking in the area of reproducing dark colors.

I looked at a lot of reviews and user opinions, and as you can see from that site most users are happy with the Samesung. It does as good a job as you're likely to get out of an LCD reproducing dark colors smoothly. There will be a little banding in very dark areas, but I was unable to find an LCD after looking for hours over the course of several days at all the various models that didn't have any banding at all. I originally grabbed the Sharp on a whim based on the fact that when looking at it in the showroom the colors looked the best, but I didn't examine it closely enough because while that was true with bright colors, it was terrible at reproducing the dark tones.

The only bad things I have to say about the TV is that Sharp's remote design and menu interface were way better, and the Sharp TV could be set to stay warmed up when off so that it would come on instantly.

But the sharp couldn't even pivot left and right. This Samsung can.

Now, if you do decide to get the Samsung you'll want to fiddle with the settings to get a picture which looks good with regular TV and DVD's and keeps banding to a minimum. Out of the box the settings aren't the best they could be, particularly for CG movies. I spent an hour or so playing with the settings and testing them on regular TV shows and various scenes from Shrek 2, and I can let you know what settings will give you a picture which is good and not so bright that you'll be blinded if you watch at night at all, and where everything will be washed out.

Another thing to consider is lag time. Some HDTV's will have lag when you play a game on them. This is due to the tv electronics being slow when scaling the pciture up or down. This Samsung has a game mode. I don't know if the game most actually speeds up the response time, but it does make the screen a little darker, presumably because games are very bright. You can adjust you brightness to compensate for this. But anyway I tried counterstrike on it with the VGA input and it seemed not to have any lag in whatever mode I was in when I would fire.

And one last thing. The picture when I hooked up my VGA connector was initially quite obvuiously scaled in some way, cause sharp vertical lines were antialised. But if windows doesn't detect the TV settings properly, you can go under the advanced tab in windows and set the front and back porch to positive or whatever, and set the hz to match what it says in the TV's manual, and then change res and go back to the real res and from then on the picture will be as sharp as a tack. But really bright! Maybe I DIDN'T have the game mode on when I was using it. Anyway you can turn down the brightness easily enough. The settings will be seperate from the main settings for the VGA connector I think.

As for home theatres, I have nothing to reccomend. I have one, but I don't know how much it cost. It came from Cambridge Soundworks. I also have not compared it to any others. So I have no idea. Your best best would be to find an audiophile review site where they tested their abilities out in great detail.

Ah yes, I do believe that Samsung may be one of the world leaders in HD technology. However, besides Circuit City, I found that same TV cheaper at Amazon (I believe that they discounted it to $1,100, which is REALLY good). Comes with free shipping. I'll wait for my credit card to free up, and see what happens, thanks.

Another brand I was looking at was Westinghouse, since that has all sorts of connectivity, but with that low of a price tag on old Westy, that may have quality to match with that price tag. Ya get what you pay for, I guess is the bottom line.

I got this puppy last year. However, I think I got it cheaper than it's listed here. I'm pretty sure it was $450.

http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/televisions/product.asp?model=26HF85

It runs in 1080i (1920 X 1080) all the time which is the highest resolution for the 360. However, I think that 720p actually looks a bit sharper since although it's technically lower resolution, it's not interlaced. Had I known that I probably would have looked for another set. However, that's not to say I don't really like this one. I doubt I could have found a better deal for a Wide/Flat screen HD set. It's perfect for the 360.

Thinking back the price might have been $549 .. but still that's cheap for HD.

Well, I spent money on the same one as "sswifty" - mine is the 26 or 28 inches version though.

Bottom line, I don't use it at all for the PC. Why, you ask? The reason being, widescreen is bent. Widescreen is okay for gaming, but I found it totally bent for actually using the PC. I now don't even use it for gaming.

Yeah, now they have it that they have 1080p sets, especially the big, clunky DLPs and larger LCDs. Of course, 720p is the required standard by the end of 2008, beginning of 2009, I don't really know that 1080p's gonna be the required resolution at all, would it?

So long as you cater for 1080p, you'll be OK :)

Catering for 1920x1200 would also be a good idea, as it's a common resolution for swanky laptops and 24" monitors.

"Why, you ask? The reason being, widescreen is bent. Widescreen is okay for gaming, but I found it totally bent for actually using the PC."


That's why you buy an LCD for your PC that can be turned on its side. Then you get a page of text, and not a mail client where the window is so wide that everything is on a single line!

Unfortunately, my laptop cannot be turned on its side.

Well, believe it or not, I actually ordered the JVC LT-32X667 yesterday, and should arrive on Monday. I gave things a lot of thought, and thought of either getting this, or getting a Samsung LN-S3241D, maybe even the LN-S3251D. I knew that these were the two brands that I felt most sold on. However, since I've owned JVC Tube TVs in the past, I thought that it would be a thought to see how they did in the LCD market. It does 768p through image processing, even tho by default it would've been 720p. I wonder how most 32" LCDs would do for PCs, even tho it has a VGA port on it, that's something to be curious about.