..hey guys..I need someone whos owe F-UI GUI (huhh..) in order to successfuly compile excellent editor for Noels Lotus R2 particle system...I will send source of editor and all files necessary for compilation, I just need compiled version...anyone can help??
F-UI users
Miscellaneous Forums/General Discussion/F-UI users I have F-UI and can compile for you - click nik for email address.
hey, thanks Smiffy..I'll do that right now...
may i recieve the compiled version too?
webmaster@...
webmaster@...
Hi Murphy..If I receive compiled version before Smiffy email you, I will send it to you...great stuff..
ye, sounds good Alien.
thx a lot.
thx a lot.
Anyone want to sent it to me as well? masterprompt<lovelyAt>kcstudios.net?
Thanks
Thanks
any updates here?
I found my copy of FUI, and built what noel had for the editor. It's not complete, and still needs work just to get the emitters and particles working.
Lotus is ok, if I could find documentation on it, sifting through the code to find out how to use it properly - bleh. But it seems powerfull.
Lotus is ok, if I could find documentation on it, sifting through the code to find out how to use it properly - bleh. But it seems powerfull.
...I still didnt received compiled version whats promised..sorry.. :(
The editor isn't finished (nor is R2, frankly -- the intended support for LPScripts was never finished, so the editor is pretty useless, frankly). That should be noted.
As for the source code, you can usually go by the function names. If it looks like something you won't use, you can usually ignore it without suffering anything.
As for the source code, you can usually go by the function names. If it looks like something you won't use, you can usually ignore it without suffering anything.
Don't get me wrong Noel, its a great lib (lotus)!
I have my doubts about its quality now, given that I could probably do it much better and faster by using a number of techniques I've learned over the course of the past year or so.
lol, then I wont fluff it too much ;-)
The technique is a bit sloppy :-P
The technique is a bit sloppy :-P
Yes it is.
Plus the code is a mess, given the lack of comments to aid others (I can still understand it a year later though).
Plus the code is a mess, given the lack of comments to aid others (I can still understand it a year later though).
Here's the compiled Lotus editor executable - as Noel mentioned it's not really fuctional at the moment.
http://www.pacemakeranimation.net/tutorials/LotusEd.zip
Here's the exe + source :
http://www.pacemakeranimation.net/tutorials/LotusR2_Editor.zip
http://www.pacemakeranimation.net/tutorials/LotusEd.zip
Here's the exe + source :
http://www.pacemakeranimation.net/tutorials/LotusR2_Editor.zip